Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

da four-tree defense

Posted on 11/27/23 at 2:43 pm
Posted by Grad92
Member since Feb 2023
1027 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 2:43 pm
this front is the most outdated defensive scheme in the country.

it leaves your linebackers and defensive tackles vulnerable when running twist stunts since it puts our slowest men on the field in position to contain very mobile dual threat qbs we faced throughout the year.

Our LBs are then left in a position to either leave their zone or attack the qb escaping... this allows for opponents WRs to become wide open.

or LBs stay in zone allowing the qb to run day and night.

makes no sense moving forward to line up 3-4 Nose guards across the line of scrimmage.

Coach Kelly if your read this please hire me

Posted by lsurulz1515
Member since Mar 2007
8182 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 2:45 pm to
Hatt Mouse, that you?
Posted by ELLSSUU
Member since Jan 2005
8036 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

da four-tree defense

Posted by Grad92 online on 11/27/23 at 2:43 pm


Presumably you graduated in 1992. Do grown ups talk like that?
Posted by mhc4tigers
Member since Aug 2016
4575 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 3:16 pm to
We do not have a true nose tackle.

75% of the time it is 4–2–5. Only 4-3 on first down. Even then probably less than 50%
Posted by Islandboy777
DAUPHIN ISLAND
Member since Jul 2023
3434 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 3:32 pm to
I like the 3-4 defense me. Put a 340lb tackle at nose. With two 300lb defense ends. 2003 defense with Lee(rip) and Spears was ideal.
Posted by Mobiletiggah
Mobile Alabama
Member since Mar 2021
4008 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 3:35 pm to
4 down is fine, but the key is there has to be pressure with 4 and the alternative 5 closing in on the backfield. The rest depends on that.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79282 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 3:38 pm to
4-3
3-4

don’t matter if you’re getting like 9 sacks total out of your starting front 4.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95322 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

2003 defense with Lee(rip) and Spears was ideal.


You mean Big Marquise (Hill)? I only ask because we had no one with either the first or last name "Lee" on the 2003 team, Hill and Spears were the big ends and Hill drowned in Lake Pontchartrain in 2007 (thus your "RIP").

Oh, and imagine that 2003 defense with either the 2019 or 2023 offense. Or the 2011 defense.
This post was edited on 11/27/23 at 3:42 pm
Posted by Grad92
Member since Feb 2023
1027 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 3:44 pm to
Ive seen the front four play the same gap almost 50% of the snaps this year.
Posted by shavedmonkey
Member since Aug 2021
30 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 3:46 pm to
I think the 03 defense was 4-3
Posted by MetArl15
Washington, DC
Member since Apr 2007
13362 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

I think the 03 defense was 4-3
It definitely was.

Hill-KWilliams-Lavalais-Spears

Alexander-Turner-Vaughan
Posted by QB
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2013
8215 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 6:59 pm to
80% is more like it, and OP's comment was around stunts/twists....and LSU doesn't know what those are, so his entire argument was flawed.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram