Started By
Message

re: Josh Giddey accused of sleeping with underage chick

Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:20 pm to
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
25929 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:20 pm to
Agree that there’s clearly a difference in a dude fondling little pre-pubescent girls and a 16 year old.

But to say that that’s not considered pedophilia as matter of factly as you did is not correct. It’s 100% against the law and rubs against our cultural norm.
This post was edited on 11/23/23 at 12:21 pm
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
15986 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

But to say that that’s not considered pedophilia as matter of factly as you did is not correct. It’s 100% against the law and rubs against our cultural norm


No, you are incorrect here. It is 100% not against the law. And the laws are written based on our cultural norms. In fact, many of our grandmothers were married and pregnant by the time they were 17.


And you cannot stretch the term pedophilia to fit every situation that you dont 100% agree with. Thats what people have done with the term racism. Not everything is pedophilia and when you try to paint it that way it does a disservice to efforts to fight against real pedophilia.
Posted by GalacticaCannon
Member since Aug 2022
2966 posts
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:37 pm to
Bro is in the NBA and could have plenty of legal IG hoes and he chooses the one he shouldn’t.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram