quote:
ball carriers are not immune and actually calling it on ball carriers will likely soon be a point of emphasis, that is one place where the rule certainly could use some tweaking - but ball carriers do not initiate contact as often as defenders. possession, illegal participation and targeting all often get reviewed at NCAA level sans a flag. I have called it on a ball carrier.

Thx for ur response, esp knowing that u are a respected official

Are you thinking that the not reviewed penalty against Daniels last week, then the not penalized review on Sam this week that led to his ejection are just coincidental?

And a followup to that would be what is your interpretation of the Devin White ejection compared to the Turner non-ejection?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by choupiquesushi

yaton rouge

Member since Jun 2006

30795 posts

Posted on 11/12/23 at 4:42 pm to wahoocs

quote:
Are you thinking that the not reviewed penalty against Daniels last week, then the not penalized review on Sam this week that led to his ejection are just coincidental?

And a followup to that would be what is your interpretation of the Devin White ejection compared to the Turner non-ejection?

The daniels hit was reviewed, no stoppage of play for review.

I was with a former SEC head coach for the devin white hit, his exact words when the hit was shown - he's gone.

1. it starts with the white hats view and opine, you can't imagine how fast that stuff happens in real life.
2. the angles and views that replay has aren't always the same as what networks show.

and... there are 140 plays in a game. Few people notice when a guy misses a block or makes a wrong read or coach makes a wrong call.. but.... when an officials call is show 11 times everyone has an opine and 99.999% of those people would fail a rules test miserably.

my guess on turner's hit is replay saw something we didn't.
2. t

2 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board