Started By
Message

re: Yesterday's targeting call was to put CBK in his place

Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:38 pm to
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30795 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

So if a flag is not thrown and it is called from a remote review, why is the ball carrier not also ejected for illegally doing the exact same thing, even more deliberately, when we can all clearly see this is what happened?

Is the ball carrier immune to neck injuries?
ball carriers are not immune and actually calling it on ball carriers will likely soon be a point of emphasis, that is one place where the rule certainly could use some tweaking - but ball carriers do not initiate contact as often as defenders. possession, illegal participation and targeting all often get reviewed at NCAA level sans a flag. I have called it on a ball carrier.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22395 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

ball carriers are not immune and actually calling it on ball carriers will likely soon be a point of emphasis, that is one place where the rule certainly could use some tweaking - but ball carriers do not initiate contact as often as defenders. possession, illegal participation and targeting all often get reviewed at NCAA level sans a flag. I have called it on a ball carrier.


Thx for ur response, esp knowing that u are a respected official

Are you thinking that the not reviewed penalty against Daniels last week, then the not penalized review on Sam this week that led to his ejection are just coincidental?

And a followup to that would be what is your interpretation of the Devin White ejection compared to the Turner non-ejection?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram