- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We won't bee free much longer because... we don't want to be free
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:11 pm to RiverCityTider
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:11 pm to RiverCityTider
Antisemtic speech and writing should be allowed. When it is a specific violent call for action, it should not be. Pretty simple.
You can say frick the Jews but you can't add "this Tuesday by killing them on Main st".
I think "from The river to the sea" obviously has enough linguistic deniability to qualify as protected speech. Even though every intellectually honest person knows it is a way to say "Exterminate the Jews" with plausible deniability. It's like saying "Let me tell you about Mein Kampf". You may indeed be talking about your idyllic Pecker-wood life on the farm, even though we know it has another meaning. The State can't decide such things.
Also, there has to be room for parody and satire and using ironic language to prove a point. Like. "I'd like to Carpet bomb Hollywood" isn't a literal statement of intent. It's just a rhetorical lament.
You can say frick the Jews but you can't add "this Tuesday by killing them on Main st".
I think "from The river to the sea" obviously has enough linguistic deniability to qualify as protected speech. Even though every intellectually honest person knows it is a way to say "Exterminate the Jews" with plausible deniability. It's like saying "Let me tell you about Mein Kampf". You may indeed be talking about your idyllic Pecker-wood life on the farm, even though we know it has another meaning. The State can't decide such things.
Also, there has to be room for parody and satire and using ironic language to prove a point. Like. "I'd like to Carpet bomb Hollywood" isn't a literal statement of intent. It's just a rhetorical lament.
2
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:17 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Antisemtic speech and writing should be allowed. When it is a specific violent call for action, it should not be. Pretty simple.
You can say frick the Jews but you can't add "this Tuesday by killing them on Main st".
I think "from The river to the sea" obviously has enough linguistic deniability to qualify as protected speech. Even though every intellectually honest person knows it is a way to say "Exterminate the Jews" with plausible deniability. It's like saying "Let me tell you about Mein Kampf". You may indeed be talking about your idyllic Pecker-wood life on the farm, even though we know it has another meaning. The State can't decide such things.
Also, there has to be room for parody and satire and using ironic language to prove a point. Like. "I'd like to Carpet bomb Hollywood" isn't a literal statement of intent. It's just a rhetorical lament.
Logical, rational, and well thought out responses like this never get the upvotes that absurd shitpost responses get on this site, but many of us appreciate them when they are posted.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:47 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Antisemtic speech and writing should be allowed.
quote:
"Antisemitism - Any perceived criticism or portrayal of an individual claiming Jewish heritage even if the genetic lineage is unproven or the alleged criticism is true."
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News