Started By
Message

re: Original Movies Vs. Copycats. Which were better?

Posted on 11/1/23 at 7:32 pm to
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
3929 posts
Posted on 11/1/23 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

I guess i can think of things like Manhunter being better than Red Dragon. But is it really a copycat? They are both based off the book.


Yeah, that's not a copycat, just a remake.

Not sure I would include the "race to the box office" genres either - Armegeddon/Deep Impact, etc. It's not really a copycat if the same idea is being launched at the same time.

When I think of "copycat" I think of the 1970s when a movie would hit and other studios would try to capitalize and replicate the formula. Disaster movies like Towering Inferno, Earthquake and the Poseidon Adventure. Blacksploitation movies like Shaft, Superfly, Foxy Brown. The Airport movies. Jaws had a few ripoffs (like Orca). Star Wars inspired a few duds as well. Ironically you could argue that Alien was an obvious copycat mashup of both Jaws and Star Wars, the two biggest hits of the decade, but it still stands so well on it's on two feet due to brilliant directing and production design.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20462 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 1:56 am to
quote:

Ironically you could argue that Alien was an obvious copycat mashup of both Jaws and Star Wars, the two biggest hits of the decade, but it still stands so well on it's on two feet due to brilliant directing and production design.

Nah, Alien was Sci Fi and Monster Horror, which are both big genres.
The plot has next to nothing to do with either of those films.

Lots of copycat movies are B movies that you can't remember the name, sometimes porn. You get almost the exact same plot, but done a bit different.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram