- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In Landmark decision, Jury Finds Realtors Conspired to inflate Commissions|$1.8 B verdict
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:16 am to Neauxla_Tiger
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:16 am to Neauxla_Tiger
quote:To the title company? I already know they are to the underwriter. The sale of that policy is the "majority of their profit"? Really?
cut out the majority of their profit.
quote:
So if you tell these Houston firms "I want you to do weeks worth of work, but I want to pay jack-shite for these services,"
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
quote:They can't bake it in because it's impossible. Which is a good thing that people get to see the line items they get hammered with over and over by all the grifters and get irritated by it.
So that sounds like as long as you're unaware that the cost of the insurance is baked into the other fees, then you're fine. But if it's a separate line item, then you're outraged? What's the difference? You're paying for the cost either way.
If you're curious how many people thinks its asinine, look at the upvote/down vote ratio of my original post. There's just a few of you knighting in here trying to justify it.
This post was edited on 11/1/23 at 11:27 am
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:19 am to billjamin
Good grief you are suchy a whiny cheapskate
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)