Started By
Message

re: In Landmark decision, Jury Finds Realtors Conspired to inflate Commissions|$1.8 B verdict

Posted on 10/31/23 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20773 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

It’s also bewildering the buyers agent is supposed to represent the purchasers interests


If you do the math on the 3% you quickly realize they don't have your best interests at heart. $10k in the sale translates to $300, and while that's nothing to sneeze at, it is minor in the scheme of things for them. They want the sale to happen and happen as quickly as possible so they can move on to the next
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
4379 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

If you do the math on the 3% you quickly realize they don't have your best interests at heart. $10k in the sale translates to $300, and while that's nothing to sneeze at, it is minor in the scheme of things for them. They want the sale to happen and happen as quickly as possible so they can move on to the next


The best is when you agree to give a little money back to the buyer after inspections, and realtors push to apply it to offset closing costs instead of reducing the sales price.

Because they would rather protect their commission than lower the buyer’s next tax bill.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram