- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/22/23 at 8:14 am to NC_Tigah
Who owns the bulk of the SPY? Blackrock.
What has happened to Blackrock's capital management during each economic downturn? It's exploded in growth.
Charts like this give you no indication of Blackrock's influence and how they keep increasing power and influence.
A $1000 investment made in August 2011 would be worth $5,820.59, or a gain of 482.06%, as of August 24, 2021, according to our calculations. This return excludes dividends but includes price appreciation.
The S&P 500 rose 285.39% and the price of gold increased -1.70% over the same time frame in comparison.
15yr return is 530% roughly for BLK and 470% for SPY
this disparity arises due to BLK's growth during bad economies. It's volatile and always manages to make big jumps in bad times like around 2008 and during covid.
If you invested $1000 in SPY on Jan 1, 2008, it would be worth $3884 today. With BLK it's $4200, which is 8% better.
The influence comes more from how much they control. While the growth in price from Jan 1, 2008 (before the downturn) for SPY is about 300%, the growth in capital management for Blackrock is over 700%. You could never invest in SPY and gain enough money to offset what BLK is doing in terms of controlling assets. The steep increase in asset control has coincided with economic downturns.
They beat the SPY long term, they are turned to for analysis by the Fed during times like the 2008 crash, they pile on more and more assets, bring in more and more managers and former banking / govt officials and so forth, to help them rig the system for their own benefit.
One snapshot, short term graph is not going to tell you anything about Blackrock.
What has happened to Blackrock's capital management during each economic downturn? It's exploded in growth.
Charts like this give you no indication of Blackrock's influence and how they keep increasing power and influence.
![](https://i.imgur.com/ENJPVzS.png)
A $1000 investment made in August 2011 would be worth $5,820.59, or a gain of 482.06%, as of August 24, 2021, according to our calculations. This return excludes dividends but includes price appreciation.
The S&P 500 rose 285.39% and the price of gold increased -1.70% over the same time frame in comparison.
15yr return is 530% roughly for BLK and 470% for SPY
this disparity arises due to BLK's growth during bad economies. It's volatile and always manages to make big jumps in bad times like around 2008 and during covid.
If you invested $1000 in SPY on Jan 1, 2008, it would be worth $3884 today. With BLK it's $4200, which is 8% better.
The influence comes more from how much they control. While the growth in price from Jan 1, 2008 (before the downturn) for SPY is about 300%, the growth in capital management for Blackrock is over 700%. You could never invest in SPY and gain enough money to offset what BLK is doing in terms of controlling assets. The steep increase in asset control has coincided with economic downturns.
They beat the SPY long term, they are turned to for analysis by the Fed during times like the 2008 crash, they pile on more and more assets, bring in more and more managers and former banking / govt officials and so forth, to help them rig the system for their own benefit.
One snapshot, short term graph is not going to tell you anything about Blackrock.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)