Started By
Message

re: Thoughts on traditional childhood vaccines?

Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:05 am to
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:05 am to
I would be interested in a comparison of women over 35 having children in 1983 vs today.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34961 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:14 am to
I would be as well. I also think it isn't unreasonable for a desire to re-evaluate a lot of these vaccines. The list has really exploded over the last decade or two and correlated side effects have also grown by leaps and bounds.

Could be the aggressive schedule they are administered, could be something in how certain ones interact together. Could be none of it and there is some completely unrelated factor (like late age pregnancies or something as you mentioned). I do think we are in a dangerous area right now where things can't even be questioned or at least urged to be re-analyzed without being labeled as some conspiracy theorist.

Plenty of the anti-vax people are nuts, but I think the last few years have shown that blind faith in the pharma community is not something they have earned. Skepticism is good. Blindly going in one direction (either blindly anti-vax or blindly do whatever pharma says) is a bad position and the one we are currently moving towards because of how people treat issues like this when legitimate questions do get raised.

This post was edited on 10/17/23 at 11:17 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram