re: Are you for the US getting directly involved in the war if Hizbollah attacks Israel?

I think as far as the eyes of the world are concerned, Hezbollah is Iran. Which is accurate. So now with two carrier groups in the Mediterranean, should Hezbollah/Iran take further advantage of what’s already been taken advantage of……our standing on the world stage takes a great hit if we do nothing, while we standby and watch innocent civilians of an ally are cut to pieces, metaphorically and literally. Again, all the while we have our carrier groups right offshore. They’ve been called to task for a purpose, and I just don’t believe it’s for the very outside shot that Iran proper introduces to the world a nuke. JMO, I certainly claim no advanced knowledge in the area.

**ETA…..this isn’t directed to you, just a general observation for some others: Where are all of our self-proclaimed Reagan purists who like to drop his name and legacy…..while at the exact same time being pussies who want to shrink from the world stage, the one that RR himself made so much effort to embolden the American moral compass by snuffing out immediate threats to our principles and those who share them? As usual, half our number here don’t know shite about what they think they do.