Started By
Message

re: Science is debunking itself again

Posted on 9/20/23 at 8:14 am to
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
52026 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 8:14 am to
quote:

This is what happens when the "theory" is developed to fit a preferred conclusion.


I don't think it was developed to fit a conclusion, but I think it's become so commonly cited that it is considered (by many) to only be a "theory" in a textual sense (essentially looking at it, and using it, as if it were a concrete law).

Some people can be incredibly resistant to change, when they are in scientific fields they are the primary ones to think of science as concrete rather than fluid.
Posted by VolcanicTiger
Member since Apr 2022
5933 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 8:25 am to
quote:

I don't think it was developed to fit a conclusion, but I think it's become so commonly cited that it is considered (by many) to only be a "theory" in a textual sense (essentially looking at it, and using it, as if it were a concrete law).

Some people can be incredibly resistant to change, when they are in scientific fields they are the primary ones to think of science as concrete rather than fluid.
There are very few chefs in science, only cooks following recipes. They don't come to these conclusions, they just repeat them, so why should their numbers be counted to add weight to certain views?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram