Started By
Message

re: Alabama changing QB after two games

Posted on 9/15/23 at 3:01 pm to
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
27323 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Do you not realize it was long term better for LSU that he didn’t play in that game?


Had he played in the bowl game and played well, LSU likely would not have gone after Daniels as a transfer. He had an opportunity to show a new coaching staff what he could do and he declined.

It was especially dumb, because he could've easily redshirted last season had he burned his redshirt the previous year.
Posted by NOSA
Member since Jan 2004
9655 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 3:06 pm to
You think the coaching staff needs to see him in a meaningless bowl game to determine if he’s good? They can tell from practice. He was a gunslinger that threw INTs and wasn’t ready, he still makes questionable throws. It was pointless to play him in that game.
This post was edited on 9/15/23 at 3:08 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram