re: Unnamed witness flips in mar-a-lago case, admits to lying to grand jury

quote:

---

He shouldn’t be any evidence. He’s an admitted liar.

---

His testimony is evidence. You get to assign credibility to that testimony, but you're supposed to put all the pieces together when judging the case as a whole. They seem to have strong enough evidence to have proven he initially lied, and if they do, presenting this evidence to the jury will accomplish the same goal (showing which time he lied). That evidence + his testimony + other evidence + testimony of others (who didn't originally lie) is a strong case.