Started By
Message

re: Could you beat a 135 pound female mma fighter (amanda nunez)without training?

Posted on 8/22/23 at 12:14 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96376 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 12:14 pm to
Because women’s bone structure, muscle mass, and strength is worlds a part from a males
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
26058 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Because women’s bone structure, muscle mass, and strength is worlds a part from a males


This is fairly true but using that as the sole criteria then you should be able to beat Sha'Carri Richardson's 10.65 100m she ran yesterday at the World Championships.

Just to the OP in general:

Weight is prevalent through the thread but Nunez has only ever been 135 for a weigh-in, she probably weighed 145 or so in a fight and 155-160 walk around and that is still low body fat.

It is amazing that so many people just ignore training and we are talking about world-class level training and ability.







Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11477 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Because women’s bone structure, muscle mass, and strength is worlds a part from a males

The goobers here, are lost on that serious fact. Some tranny dude just destroyed the female powerlifting record. It will never be broken by a true female. Hell, you've got hundreds of high school track athletes, EVERY frickING YEAR, that beat the record of the fastest female ever. Even the best female soccer team on Earth, got destroyed by a 14 year old boys team.

This is akin to the idiots who claim Bruce Lee would beat a prime Mike Tyson's arse. Keyboard jockeys who's only fight experience is with a PS5 controller.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram