Do any of you know about the Missouri Law that allows instate kids to commit in state

They can only collect if they go to an in state school

Video

FSU says it’s not true.

FSU has to save face. They paying uncommitted kids big youtuber didn't want to show receipts or give high school player name. He said the kid showed him the monthly deposits from FSU it was in the thousands.

I live in St. Louis and the Law is in essence a circumvention of the traditional signing. While they cannot sign a binding NLI, you can sign a financial aid agreement with a university starting August 1st of your final academic year. It is a commitment to receive financial aid at a university, but not binding in the same manner as an NLI. So, the law in essence lets any in state player that has a financial aid agreement completed with an in state school start receiving financial gain from NIL opportunities. It doesn’t violate the NIL rules because it’s technically an agreement with the academic institution rather than a commitment to the athletic program.

What is to stop an NIL bag from a Texas business from landing in the athlete's lap once they are eligible to receive NIL benefits as a high school student?

Basically the way I see it, Mizzou high school athletes get open season for the highest bidder.

Could this bankrupt Mizzou NIL efforts (having to pay and fend off in state recruits before they even are college eligible?)

If UGA had to play footsie with all of the high school recruits in Georgia, this would be a huge strain on limited resources.

This law doesn't appear like a recruiting win (yet).

Paying NIL a different way does not automatically make it a better way.

It will be one to wait and watch.

For UGA and Bama (who do not try to set the market on NIL deals for high schoolers... yet) this appears to be a nothingburger.
If anything, it could be a strain on Missouri's NIL resources. How many high schoolers are going to get checks? How many juniors are going to get upset that those funds aren't going to players who actually earn the wins?

The idea of the law isn’t checks. Missouri NIL focus has definitely been more built on endorsements for its top in state guys, so this law helps bolster that. A guy like Luther Burden has a ton of endorsements in St. Louis, so this law is aimed at increasing that path for top Missouri guys that traditionally leave the state in recent years.

Presumably contract language. That hypothetical is redundant because that’s already happening. Obviously nothing short of NCAA regulation would prevent that hypothetical. The law is solely aimed at incentivizing a high school kid in Missouri to go to school in Missouri initially.

I mean, it kind of has. You are fully right that their is gray area that we will see overtime how that works, But Mizzou has a strong chance of landing 2 in state five stars, both guys who early on looked like they would go out of state. Not saying it’s the laws effect, but Missouri as a state embracing NIL for the big name guys in the Missouri metro areas is starting to pay off. Time will tell how much the law aides that, but it doesn’t seem to be pointless or a nothing burger yet.