Started By
Message

re: The only proof anyone needs re: election fraud is that nobody can prove there wasn’t any.

Posted on 8/18/23 at 5:41 pm to
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68269 posts
Posted on 8/18/23 at 5:41 pm to

That's why I say there should be a presumption of fraud if the system is not transparent or auditable.

That way you can eliminate the presumption by having a very secure system.

If systems like that were in place you would never see a riot or January 6th type event again. All of the results would be accepted.
Posted by LSUA 75
Colfax,La.
Member since Jan 2019
3708 posts
Posted on 8/18/23 at 6:11 pm to
To me,it’s common sense to suppose that if the election wasn’t stolen the party that”won” would have been more than happy to roll out the proof that the election was legit.
Then the one’s alleging the election was stolen would be looking foolish.

But that’s not what was done,Dem’s fought tooth and toenail to stop any examination of the election results.

Anyone with half a brain knows it was stolen.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15471 posts
Posted on 8/18/23 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

That's why I say there should be a presumption of fraud if the system is not transparent or auditable.


Agree.

That is basically how every other process or system works and is authenticated into evidence. Especially when you can demonstrate that the proponent of the system failed to follow its own protocols
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram