Started By
Message

re: Good news for Lake Charles area - Commonwealth LNG moving forward in Cameron Parish

Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:02 am to
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
4514 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:02 am to
"But the effects of the giveaway are often serious.

Since 2006, East Baton Rouge Parish's taxing authorities have lost $571 million to the industrial tax exemption. Ascension Parish gave up $958 million. Jefferson Parish gave up $156 million and Orleans Parish gave up $112 million, according to the Louisiana Tax Commission."

"But the biggest losers, by far, have been the parishes in southwest Louisiana, a breeding ground in recent years for massive, multibillion-dollar megaplants that process liquid natural gas. Those plants have taken full advantage of Louisiana’s generous break: Since 2006, Cameron Parish has lost out on $4.3 billion and Calcasieu Parish has given up $3 billion in property taxes. That's three times the amount forgone by the No. 3 parish, St. Charles, which has lost out on $1 billion."

Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31761 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:19 am to
quote:

"But the effects of the giveaway are often serious.

Since 2006, East Baton Rouge Parish's taxing authorities have lost $571 million to the industrial tax exemption. Ascension Parish gave up $958 million. Jefferson Parish gave up $156 million and Orleans Parish gave up $112 million, according to the Louisiana Tax Commission."

"But the biggest losers, by far, have been the parishes in southwest Louisiana, a breeding ground in recent years for massive, multibillion-dollar megaplants that process liquid natural gas. Those plants have taken full advantage of Louisiana’s generous break: Since 2006, Cameron Parish has lost out on $4.3 billion and Calcasieu Parish has given up $3 billion in property taxes. That's three times the amount forgone by the No. 3 parish, St. Charles, which has lost out on $1 billion."



so you argument is they lost these taxes right?

so if they don't give the exemption and these projects don't happen....did they really lose anything?

just to be clear...your argument is that SWLA should stop giving these exemptions and not get any of these projects

vs

give the exemption...look at the long term plan for the parish, area and the benefits where they can grab tons of temp jobs and all the sales tax etc. that comes with it for the first 5 years, then tons of perm jobs and all the benefits that come with that over the next 5....then 10 years later get a big windfall right?


so its better to be spiteful and get nothing

than compromise and secure long term growth for the area???

just making sure I understand your argument because you don't seem to understand...without ITEP these projects don't happen. period.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25445 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Since 2006, East Baton Rouge Parish's taxing authorities have lost $571 million to the industrial tax exemption. Ascension Parish gave up $958 million. Jefferson Parish gave up $156 million and Orleans Parish gave up $112 million, according to the Louisiana Tax Commission."


Unless they are writing checks or financing the construction directly, they aren’t losing anything. Its an important distinction because some places actually do that, and it’s incredibly risky and stupid, especially if it’s for a company that isn’t very established. And of course it’s another avenue for influence peddling.

For Louisiana’s tax exemption program - the option is to voluntarily not collect taxes in exchange for a private investment in a certain district or to not collect taxes on a private investment that never comes. Either way they aren’t getting that tax revenue. But if you offer the exemption, you at least get the jobs and indirect tax revenue for the duration of the exemption (5 years usually, but it’s sometimes extended).

Let’s say there is a major company in an industry that Louisiana and Texas are both targeting for investment in their districts. The correct move for both states is to make sure the tax code is business friendly and build out infrastructure to be competitive naturally. But that will not happen quickly. The second best move is to offer tax incentives on investment in the state if the new factory or expansion results in critical new infrastructure or new jobs. The absolute worst outcome often to do nothing and have neither the jobs nor the tax revenue, which tends to result in our human capital moving to Texas, Georgia, or Tennessee.

La needs to target businesses that invest in large private infrastructure projects (like LNG export terminals, rail yards, pipelines, etc) and those that hire a lot of people (like refineries, auto plants, corporate HQ, etc.). We are doing a great job with the industrial base, but our performance in tech and other white collar jobs are disappointing.

Outside of deep water access and pipeline network, Louisiana’s infrastructure is total crap - especially from the perspective of education, energy transmission, and our road/highway network. That has to be addressed either way. LADOTD, public schools, and Entergy are not delivering adequate performance for most of the state.
This post was edited on 8/16/23 at 9:34 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425279 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 11:33 am to
quote:

"But the biggest losers, by far, have been the parishes in southwest Louisiana, a breeding ground in recent years for massive, multibillion-dollar megaplants that process liquid natural gas. Those plants have taken full advantage of Louisiana’s generous break: Since 2006, Cameron Parish has lost out on $4.3 billion

Do you know what they call Cameron Parish without these projects?

Uninhabited swamp land with a few government buildings
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram