- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelosi will be called as a J6 witness by Trump. He will prove she orchestrated J6!!
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:55 pm to deathvalleytiger10
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:55 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Do you believe the prosecution will use J6 as evidence in the case of Trump obstructing certification proceedings?
No, at least beyond the mere fact that it happened. They don’t need it to prove any of the charges.
quote:
directed them to the Capitol to obstruct the certification proceedings."
What.
Does.
That.
Have
To
Do
With
Pelosi?
2
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:59 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
What.
Does.
That.
Have
To
Do
With
Pelosi?
I already told you.
just because that doesn't put reasonable doubt into your mind, doesn't mean it won't in someone else's mind.
and that's one of the routes the defense will take.
the he was trying to stop anything from happening at all.
Which in the minds of some will be enough to doubt that he "used" it.
the prosecution will then go the same route you are taking.
saying ok, yeah he tried to stop it, but once it happened, he did .....
which side will present the better argument?
hell if I know,.
this isn't that difficult to figure out.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 2:11 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
No, at least beyond the mere fact that it happened.
Wow. Ok. Now I understand your level of thinking. Thinking that goes against what is already out there in the indictment.
Now, regarding Pelosi. I never opined on her in these posts, I just pointed out that you were incorrect in saying the indictments did not involve the riots.
But let's look at a few questions...and I do not know the answers, but I do think they are relevant if the prosecution is going to use J6 has evidence as they have outlined in the indictment.
Did Pelosi turn down requests for more security?
Did Pelosi actually have fewer Capitol Police on site than normal?
Were there Feds in the crowd?
If so, did these individuals incite the crowd and provoke them into entering the Capitol?
Who unlocked the doors? Who gave that order?
I am just a common sense individual. It seems to me that a certain combination of answers to these questions could shoot a very big hole into exactly what a portion of the indictment alleges. And that is that people other than Trump led to the obstruction of the proceedings. Who knows? It is certainly plausible.
Now, why is it being pitched that Pelosi would be called as a witness...? Politics. Just like the indictment of Trump. Politics.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News