- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alan Dershowitz Says Jack Smith May Be Indicted If Trump Wins Case
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:36 pm to Auburn1968
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:36 pm to Auburn1968
Dershowitz keeps claiming this is a First Amendment case. It is not. The indictment specifically states Trump has a right to voice his opinion about the election, and even lie about the election if he wants to. Trump is not being indicted for statements made in his Jan. 6 speech.
The First Amendment does not protect your right to commit a crime. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.
I think the indictment might be a stretch on fraud against the US, but you can expect to hear more evidence as co conspirators get charged in superceding indictments.
The First Amendment does not protect your right to commit a crime. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.
I think the indictment might be a stretch on fraud against the US, but you can expect to hear more evidence as co conspirators get charged in superceding indictments.
7
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:41 pm to Dday63
quote:
The First Amendment does not protect your right to commit a crime. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.
The only fraudulent conspiracy to deny rights is the one Jack O. Smith has created. There has been a long line of those fraudulent conspiracies against Trump starting with Hillary's pee pee dossier and the Russia hoax.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:04 pm to Dday63
All jackass Dems are ignorant dumbshits and simply cannot help themselves.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:34 pm to Dday63
quote:
Dershowitz keeps claiming this is a First Amendment case. It is not. The indictment specifically
So a unknown poster knows more than a Harvard law professor who just happens to be an expert on constitutional law. Read that slowly and you will see how stupid your post is.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:42 pm to Dday63
quote:
Dershowitz keeps claiming this is a First Amendment case. It is not. The indictment specifically states Trump has a right to voice his opinion about the election, and even lie about the election if he wants to. Trump is not being indicted for statements made in his Jan. 6 speech.
The First Amendment does not protect your right to commit a crime. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.
I think the indictment might be a stretch on fraud against the US, but you can expect to hear more evidence as co conspirators get charged in superceding indictments.
If you were correct about this, Smith would not have manipulated Trump's comments when he quoted him in the indictment.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 4:26 pm to Dday63
quote:
The First Amendment does not protect your right to commit a crime. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.
Good to know. With that logic every person who spread Russian collusion lies will now be charged for trying to overthrow a democratically elected president.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:27 pm to Dday63
quote:
If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy
Wouldn't the DOJ's jock strap lawyer have to prove Trump didn't believe he lost the election in order to prove a crime?
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:00 pm to Dday63
quote:
. If your speech is part of a fraudulent conspiracy, you aren't protected.
I’d like to air some legal grievances against some government officials then.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News