Started By
Message

re: Children allege LPSO deputy molested them

Posted on 7/6/23 at 8:50 am to
Posted by boogedy
Member since May 2011
396 posts
Posted on 7/6/23 at 8:50 am to
They obviously did look into it and must have found there was not enough probable cause to take action. The article reads that he tickled their genitals. What is a doctor going to be able to determine? We obviously don't know the whole story. Did the mother ask leading questions, is it not suspicious this came out the same time as Perkins. Was the mom trying to capitalize on something here. Yall have to stop believing everything yall read or see in the media. I don't work for LPSO so I have no biases but you can't just ruin someone's life over allegations.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67602 posts
Posted on 7/6/23 at 9:25 am to
quote:

They obviously did look into it and must have found there was not enough probable cause to take action.


something that happens thousands of times by different police agencies every day probably.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16649 posts
Posted on 7/6/23 at 10:38 am to
quote:

The article reads that he tickled their genitals. What is a doctor going to be able to determine? We obviously don't know the whole story. Did the mother ask leading questions

That was odd to me too when I read the article. Obviously we do not know what they mean when they say tickled their genitals, but how do you "test" for that? (rhetorical because I really don't want to know)

With that said, this sounds like leading questions
quote:

She said 'yes, daddy touches my tutu.' I said how did he do it, and I said I'd bring you a baby doll so you can show me how he did it. My oldest was 7 and she said 'oh, does he tickle it like this?' I said does he do it to you? She said 'yes, he does it to me.'"

Again, not knowing what was done, the father could have thought he needed to clean her area and the motion from mom made it look like he was molesting her when he was simply cleaning. With that said, he very well could have been doing a lot more than just cleaning, but without penetration how do you "test for it" outside of answering questions. And since the Dr is most likely not a professional interrogator, can you rely on her line of questioning without physical evidence?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram