re: Police Absurdities

I notice that no one seems to want to touch the issue of canines. Yet, this is one of the more comical things we tolerate. Canine use has been repeatedly shown to be shaky. Yet, the defense is always that they do well when "tested".

I'm like, good fricking god, have none of you ever owned an animal? Even a well trained one? You know what animals are especially good at? Knowing what their owners want.

I've ridden horses all my life and now my daughter does too. Ya know what happens when you get on your horse in a shitty mood? The horse often reflects that mood.

The numbers CLEARLY show that the dogs are very "meh" in real life and that's before you get to the cops who have been busted "helping" the dogs "hit".

So, people get the privilege of being pulled over......having some cop INTENTIONALLY prolong the top.......having a dog hop arounod on all over their car with sharp nails scratching their paint...........for a "method" that has barely better than a coin flip chance of being correct.

AND, a method that has literally zero way to counter in terms of being "justfied". How many people could EVER prove the handler "helped" the dog? And, handler's ain't dumb(for the most part). Getting caught on camera has happened, but rarely.