- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/28/23 at 1:16 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
and unless he testifies, that has no particular relevance ... even if true.
I can't believe his lawyers will want that, but assuming he doesn't, he still has made conflicting statements about his conduct. Those public statements can be admissible and go against his credibility (which isn't much personally obviously, but the presidency gets a lot of deference).
And that cross-examination looks ok, but you're putting words in the witnesses' mouths. They've already published that trump referenced a "4-page" Milley memo in Mark Meadows' book.
This post was edited on 6/28/23 at 1:22 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)