- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ asks Judge to silence Trump
Posted on 6/17/23 at 10:34 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/17/23 at 10:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
P/O s are standard in cases like this.
I have P/Os in cases with much less important allegations
I'm going to suggest that a case in which the defendant is running for president, leading in the polls, and who is facing an alleged political prosecution to prevent that presidency, might be a little bit different than your personal injury case.
This is a legitimate, huge first amendment issue.
1
Posted on 6/17/23 at 11:27 am to moneyg
quote:
might be a little bit different than your personal injury case.
quote:
This is a legitimate, huge first amendment issue.
It's not, though. At least in terms of current precedent on P/Os and classified information/national security documents.
This post was edited on 6/17/23 at 11:28 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News