re: Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch on the Trump Indictment

quote:

---

Think he’s referring to case la w, and the Clinton’s sock drawer ruling, as precedent

---

And it’s a nonsensical comparison. Those were Clinton’s own audiotapes of interviews of Clinton and his biographer. I’m not sure why anyone would wonder why those would be considered personal property.

Regardless to argue that because those were determined to be personal, then anything, including literal national security plans if the military invaded another nation, are also personal records, is just outlandishly illogical. And it’s just wrong.