I am telling you that the Code does not address spending. The TCJA was a change to the Code. It’s pretty straight forward.

A bill to change the Code cannot address spending. You didn’t know that?

Clearly you don’t know how the process of changing the Code occurs. It’s not a big deal. You are ignorant to the process. That isn’t unique.

I’m positive you don’t know the reason for the sunsets….right? Did you know about the sunsets? Do you know what sunset means?

Also, just to confirm, your biggest issue with the change to the Code was that it cut taxes too much….right? Did you know about the sunsets! Do you know what sunset means?

I should clarify, because clearly you need it. Any reference to the Code is a reference to the Tax Code.

This post was edited on 6/5/23 at 10:34 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Marcus Aurelius

Member since Oct 2020

3900 posts

Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:59 pm to BBONDS25

OK technically you are correct... it has been six years. I thought I remembered that they did the tax bill within the budget deal using reconciliation to get it through. The budget deal THAT TRUMP SIGNED was an ONMIBUS deal separate from the tax bill (that changed the code)... SO BACK TO POINT ... TRUMP signed the budget deal that did address spending. The TRUMP signed the tax deal that went too far relative to the Spending bill that he supported. The two TRUMP supported bills blew up the deficit and added to the national debt.

It is when he said "never again" ... yet he did it AGAIN and AGAIN... blowing up the deficit and adding to the national debt.

... back to the OP... Trump pac continues to lie about DeSantis tax position and to my knowledge nobody in the thread posted something that I saw that stated Trump supported eliminating the IRS for individual tax payers. Curious, do you?

This post was edited on 6/5/23 at 11:07 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board