Started By
Message

re: DeSantis brands Putin ‘a war criminal’ who should be held accountable for Ukraine invasion

Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:57 pm to
Posted by Jayrod79
Colorado
Member since Apr 2019
613 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

of mostly replacement fencing.


Your still pushing your own narrative.


US News And world report

"The wall consists mostly of 18- to 30-foot steel bollards anchored in concrete. The barriers also feature sensors, lights, cameras and parallel roads in some places.

The vast majority of the 458 miles were constructed in places where some kind of barrier already existed, but most of the preexisting structures were far less imposing than the new wall and included fencing and rudimentary technical barriers. The total figure also includes what the agency calls “secondary border wall” or sections of wall built behind preexisting barriers that ultimately remained in place."

Fence was replaced with wall. It's really simple. Even in places where there were existing fence it was replaced with a superior structure. That included 458 miles not 45 . New wall was in places it never existed is obviously lower. Existing wall that was torn up in most places or built behind is still new wall. Your suggesting that the labors and workers built 45 miles of wall and it is a flat out lie.
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4360 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

Your still pushing your own narrative.



I'm not pushing a narrative. I say every time he built 45 miles of "new" fencing. I'm aware of the replacement fencing he built. It might be better but it's still replacement fencing.

quote:

The vast majority of the 458 miles were constructed in places where some kind of barrier already existed,


Why? Because getting permits and money to build on land without an existing structure was too difficult, so they didn't do it. In other words he failed.

quote:

Your suggesting that the labors and workers built 45 miles of wall and it is a flat out lie.


I'm suggesting that there's a difference between new and replacement. I think you're just assuming I'm talking about total fencing.

Again it would have taken quite a lot of work to get a wall across our entire border, so Trump elected to erect some fencing in places where it would be easy, so that he could claim victory.

Remember the prototypes? Everyone cheered but it was all a publicity stunt. Ultimately he didn't build a wall but fencing.

Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72937 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 8:32 pm to
quote:


Your still pushing your own narrative.


US News And world report

"The wall consists mostly of 18- to 30-foot steel bollards anchored in concrete. The barriers also feature sensors, lights, cameras and parallel roads in some places.

The vast majority of the 458 miles were constructed in places where some kind of barrier already existed, but most of the preexisting structures were far less imposing than the new wall and included fencing and rudimentary technical barriers. The total figure also includes what the agency calls “secondary border wall” or sections of wall built behind preexisting barriers that ultimately remained in place."

Fence was replaced with wall. It's really simple. Even in places where there were existing fence it was replaced with a superior structure. That included 458 miles not 45 . New wall was in places it never existed is obviously lower. Existing wall that was torn up in most places or built behind is still new wall. Your suggesting that the labors and workers built 45 miles of wall and it is a flat out lie.




hackett is a HACK.....how fitting and a lying POS.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram