- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Famed atheist and biologist calls the idea of more than two genders “utter nonsense”
Posted on 3/22/23 at 1:27 pm to UGATiger26
Posted on 3/22/23 at 1:27 pm to UGATiger26
quote:
Nice try, "scientist." I didn't say you were. You want to change the paradigm and start doing something different that will - assumedly - offer more benefits for developing children. Do you understand how science works?
Once again, I am not the one attempting to change laws, create new restrictions on speech, and/or impose specific norms against something, you are.
I thought conservatives understood that restrictions on liberty and speech require a strong burden of proof, not the other way around?
...Of course we both know that rhetoric has always been bullshite, and stuff like this highlights it
Posted on 3/22/23 at 1:29 pm to Bronc
quote:
am not the one attempting to change laws, create new restrictions on speech
Stop sexualizing children and you'll be left alone.
No one was at war with you shits until you turned the focus on children.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 3/22/23 at 1:34 pm to Bronc
quote:
I thought conservatives understood that restrictions on liberty and speech require a strong burden of proof, not the other way around?
You are so full of shite at this point that you are accusing me of things that I never said. I never said anything about banning drag queen story hour.
I'm asking you, the purported science-follower, to show us the science that drag queen story hour is a positive thing for childhood intellectual and literary development. Can you not provide that?
You're the one championing this programming; not me. So tell us why, preferably providing evidence that is in the childrens' best interests for their intellectual development.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 1:35 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News