- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why don't suburbs like Central and Walker ban high density developments?
Posted on 3/6/23 at 9:53 am to GreatLakesTiger24
Posted on 3/6/23 at 9:53 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
personally, a suburb has to go "all out" like this or i have no interest. either make in nice, clean, pretty, safe, and sanitized... or don't bother.
There is no way to even come close to preserving the "small town feel' without actually being a small town unless there are some pretty tight restrictions on development.
And ultimately it's going to end up just being a more expensive suburb with a bogie main street. But I'd rather live there than in a poorly planned, overly dense suburb.
IMO Baton Rouge has sort of lacked a more controlled, better quality suburb because the city itself was more viable than places like Jackson (which has Madison) or Memphis (which has Germantown, Collierville, Arlington, and Olive Branch). You still have a lot of working/middle class people in Baton Rouge that are totally okay with paying tuition. So there wasn't as much of a need for higher quality suburbs until fairly recently. And they've just not had quite as much time to get themselves organized yet.
But yeah - sign/lighting restrictions, the curbing of multi-family rental housing/apartment complexes, and careful sewer and road infrastructure improvements just aren't really seen in Louisiana's suburbs. At least not yet.
This post was edited on 3/6/23 at 9:57 am
Posted on 3/6/23 at 11:42 am to dewster
quote:
IMO Baton Rouge has sort of lacked a more controlled, better quality suburb because the city itself was more viable than places like Jackson (which has Madison) or Memphis (which has Germantown, Collierville, Arlington, and Olive Branch). You still have a lot of working/middle class people in Baton Rouge that are totally okay with paying tuition. So there wasn't as much of a need for higher quality suburbs until fairly recently. And they've just not had quite as much time to get themselves organized yet.
baton rouge also sucks arse to get in and out of. Going a few miles in Baton Rouge can take a half hour.
Add that the burbs are almost certainly going to come with increased flood risk and it makes sense why a "the woodlands lite" never developed in BR.
St Fransville is the most realistic option
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News