- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CPAC: Jack Posobiec & Amanda Milius discuss getting rid of bureaucrats Via Schedule F
Posted on 3/4/23 at 9:36 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 3/4/23 at 9:36 am to cajunangelle
If Trump is looking strong prior to the elections, Congress will likely take action to nullify or repeal any Schedule F stuff he can do.
I don't really agree with Congress's power here. I believe the President is closer to the "unitary executive" that Scalia talked about. Article II supports that, the constitutional convention etc. They specifically talked about a "council" and rejected that type of idea and specifically made the President the chief executive. They gave Congress checks and balances, but not executive authority. Congress has enumerated powers because they wanted Congress constrained. Article II is remarkably short and has no enumerated powers, and it was specifically written that way because the President was meant to exercise a lot of discretion.
Works well when you have a good president.
Congress is not permitted to hire, fire, or retain or force the retention of executive branch personnel any more than the President can dictate who is on a congressional staff.
I don't really agree with Congress's power here. I believe the President is closer to the "unitary executive" that Scalia talked about. Article II supports that, the constitutional convention etc. They specifically talked about a "council" and rejected that type of idea and specifically made the President the chief executive. They gave Congress checks and balances, but not executive authority. Congress has enumerated powers because they wanted Congress constrained. Article II is remarkably short and has no enumerated powers, and it was specifically written that way because the President was meant to exercise a lot of discretion.
Works well when you have a good president.
Congress is not permitted to hire, fire, or retain or force the retention of executive branch personnel any more than the President can dictate who is on a congressional staff.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News