re: Stolen History - Lifting the Veil of Deception (Doc Part 1 - Introduction)

quote:

---

the fine lines are drawn in this

---

By "fine lines" you mean the sketch?

quote:

---

unfortunately, I have no paintings of that age to submit, hence "moderately provable"

---

You understand that a huge number of major works have undergone reflectography or radiography?
No.
Nevermind, obviously you don't.

So, for clarification, there are techniques used to detect forgeries that quite easily disprove old paintings as touched up photographs.

Scientists historically acted like scientists. They made observations, formed hypotheses, tested them, and documented everything they did. It's how we can track when photography was first attempted, why it failed, and when it first succeeded. The fact tree trunks are round, and were abundantly available to pre-Columbian (Ah! There that "mysterious" 'Columbia' word again) aboriginals, does not mean they discovered the wheel. They had the resources. They had the skill. They did not have the wheel.

Nor did anyone from the 16th, 17th or 18th century have a photograph. Nor is the earth flat. Sorry.