- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

World Series of Poker (no spoilers allowed.)
Posted on 11/11/08 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 11/11/08 at 9:30 pm
How did this Scott Montgomery dude make the final table. He is an idiot.
Posted on 11/12/08 at 5:42 am to dj30
quote:
How did this Scott Montgomery dude make the final table. He is an idiot.
Yes he is he caught a 2 outer on a re raise all in with ace high on the turn vs a guy who was pot committed with about 20 left.. he is an idiot.. Dennis Phillips isnt that good either he just caught a good run of cards..
Posted on 11/12/08 at 8:54 am to PokerChamp21
Did anyone at the final table really play that well? Demidov made a few good plays, but overall the final two caught really good cards. Flopping sets etc. I was not overly impressed with the play at the final table.
Posted on 11/12/08 at 9:45 am to snatchola
they really didnt show a very large % ofthe action, except for the bust-out hands, and a few good plays..in real time the two euros, and marquis were raising, stealing, and re-stealing alot..kind of bullying the rest of the players around a bit....that's not "good tv", though, so you didnt see it..
there were a couple really good players on that table..ylon schwertz(sp?), eastgate, demidov, rheem, and marquis are all very good players who would steamroll the majority of donks and average players in the main event..
so run down of the players:
Demidov: very good, very agro
Eastgate: good, agressive, hard to read
Marquis: online player, very good
Rheem: more of a live player, very good, reads others well
Schwartz: more standard of a player..good player
suharto: very average-semi-donk, tight, lucky to be there
phillips: old man calling station, very lucky to be there..donk
montgomery: agro, erratic, semi-donk..not sure how he's a pro..
there were a couple really good players on that table..ylon schwertz(sp?), eastgate, demidov, rheem, and marquis are all very good players who would steamroll the majority of donks and average players in the main event..
so run down of the players:
Demidov: very good, very agro
Eastgate: good, agressive, hard to read
Marquis: online player, very good
Rheem: more of a live player, very good, reads others well
Schwartz: more standard of a player..good player
suharto: very average-semi-donk, tight, lucky to be there
phillips: old man calling station, very lucky to be there..donk
montgomery: agro, erratic, semi-donk..not sure how he's a pro..
Posted on 11/12/08 at 3:23 pm to chowds4
quote:
phillips: old man calling station, very lucky to be there..donk
by far the worst player at the table with scott montgomery being a close second. I also think Scott Montgomery may putt from the rough
Posted on 11/12/08 at 3:42 pm to MaravichLSU
quote:
by far the worst player
quote:
scott montgomery being a close second
So he by far had a close lead as the worst player?
The frick?
Posted on 11/12/08 at 3:44 pm to reddman
quote:
So he by far had a close lead as the worst player?
The frick?
that was like an oxymoron. your right reddman. im sorry. they both sucked dick. better?
Posted on 11/12/08 at 3:45 pm to chowds4
quote:
chowds4
just talks to talk
This post was edited on 11/12/08 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 11/12/08 at 3:49 pm to MaravichLSU
quote:
that was like an oxymoron. your right reddman. im sorry. they both sucked dick. better?
Posted on 11/12/08 at 4:28 pm to MaravichLSU
scott really sucks.. anyway you can interpret sucks.
Popular
Back to top
2






