Started By
Message

re: Derek Carr will reportedly exercise his no-trade clause

Posted on 2/13/23 at 8:37 pm to
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10074 posts
Posted on 2/13/23 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

The only thing Davis could do that is dumber than giving an 8-year veteran a $121 million extension and giving up on him in the 1st year of that extension is to pay him $74 million to be a backup.

There was nothing dumb about his extension, and it wasn’t $120M—it was a 1 year deal to a FA playing with a new coach that gave them an out. The only thing dumb that they did was not try to ink the trade when they were 2-7 and a market of teams trying to “win now” still existed.
Posted by LSU82BILL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2006
10341 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

The only thing dumb that they did was not try to ink the trade when they were 2-7 and a market of teams trying to “win now” still existed.


They couldn't trade him because they gave him a (dumb) full no trade clause in the contract.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
12838 posts
Posted on 2/14/23 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

The only thing dumb that they did was not try to ink the trade when they were 2-7 and a market of teams trying to “win now” still existed.


Does he not have veto power?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram