Started By
Message

re: This is what Florida had set up for Rashada:

Posted on 2/7/23 at 11:19 am to
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
8547 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 11:19 am to
quote:

The bigger question is was that contract tied to him playing for Florida?


According to sources (no actual contract is shown in the article), the contract did the exact opposite by including a clause stating the contract was null and void if it violated any NCAA rules. And if the contract tied him to playing for Florida, that would indeed be a violation. The contract did require that he reside in Gainesville and make various public appearances, but that would be typical of any indorsement contract.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28733 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 11:44 am to
quote:

According to sources (no actual contract is shown in the article), the contract did the exact opposite by including a clause stating the contract was null and void if it violated any NCAA rules. And if the contract tied him to playing for Florida, that would indeed be a violation. The contract did require that he reside in Gainesville and make various public appearances, but that would be typical of any indorsement contract.


Thanks for clearing that up. It, in effect, tied him to playing for Florida without specifically stating such in the contract. Meaning, he's likely not going to live in Gainesville and make public appearances in Gainesville if he's not playing for Florida.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram