quote:
Nobody's saying it is. Laws against weed are nannyism. Cut and dried. "People might overdo it/might not research it" is NOT a sound argument for government to step in. Not if one supports a free society.

You are replying to the end of my conversation so maybe you didn’t read my earlier posts. I have no problem with it being legal, all I’m saying is as a society we should put proper information out there before some poor, misinformed person screws up and eats an entire weed brownie and has a schizophrenic episode that they didnt know they were prone to.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by RogerTheShrubber

Juneau, AK

Member since Jan 2009

263259 posts

Posted on 2/6/23 at 12:39 pm to bodask42

quote:
. I have no problem with it being legal, all I’m saying is as a society we should put proper information out there before some poor, misinformed person screws up and eats an entire weed brownie and has a schizophrenic episode that they didnt know they were prone to.

They won't do it again..

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by TbirdSpur2010

ALAMO CITY

Member since Dec 2010

134026 posts

Posted on 2/6/23 at 12:41 pm to bodask42

quote:
all I’m saying is as a society we should put proper information out there before some poor, misinformed person screws up and eats an entire weed brownie and has a schizophrenic episode that they didnt know they were prone to.

Nah. Let natural selection weed out idiots (pun intended).

It's not "society's" responsibility to do due diligence for adults. I don't have a problem with people educating themselves. People should do that anyways. In the meantime, though, it doesn't need to be done before repealing government overreach RE: weed.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board