Started By
Message

re: 'The Last of Us' Episode 3 Gamers Thread: Spoilers!! Complaints, Part 2 talk allowed

Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:14 pm to
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
16681 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

I think most of us came to bitch about 60 minutes of useless TV


The show was always going to have to expand on the backstory of characters at some point. Otherwise it would be a hour of sneaking around and looking for ladders every week. I wasn’t a huge fan of the backstory of the relationship but the way it tied together was pretty good.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
6578 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

I wasn’t a huge fan of the backstory of the relationship


If you're going to do an episode on two people, shouldn't they live past that single episode? I mean, it's not five seasons into Walking Dead where you delve into someone's past that you've seen for multiple episodes (if not for two or three seasons.)

TWD and FTWD both got kinda soft in the last three seasons, but the characters already had us invested, so we paid attention when there were weird one-off jags that didn't seem to fit with the overall story arc. That's not where we are with TLOU. I may come back to it after the season closes if they develop a coherent story that is interesting, but to see the actors do this stuff is painful.
Posted by The Quiet One
Former United States
Member since Oct 2013
11608 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 1:16 am to
quote:

The show was always going to have to expand on the backstory of characters at some point


Problem is, they did a 180-degree rewrite from the game to do it. Absolutely none of this happens (that we're ever aware of) and the ending is a literal polar opposite of what actually takes place in the game.

Could have done an episode like this with Ish, a character that is basically storyboarded already in the game and has a better story than what we just watched. I won't spoil details of Ish's story in the slim chance the show actually delves into it, but it does everything this episode purportedly does and it's an incredibly more devastating ending vs 2 old twinks ODing in bed together after an evening of dressing up and fine dining.

We all know why this got retconned.
Posted by ouflak
Manchester, England
Member since Jul 2021
356 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 8:44 am to
quote:

(Multiple paraquote) In the game, he was gay.


Not true. It's hinted at, sure. That's it.

quote:

The show was always going to have to expand on the backstory of characters at some point.


Fine. Dive into Ellie and give us some reasons why she is so caustic (perhaps how her parents/siblings(?) were lost). Or go into Joel's life just after the death of his daughter and how he goes medieval on the infected - and perhaps even a few of the not-so-infected. Heck they could even dedicate some interesting dystopian time on the government's response and motivations.

Any of those kind of backstory details progress the story and move it along, even though it's events that occurred in the past. Bill was a small, though interesting, part of the journey. Frank was already dead. Their relationship, whatever that might have been, had nothing to do with the story. What a waste of nice opportunity to fill in some intriguing world building.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 5:25 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram