- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'The Last of Us' Episode 3 Gamers Thread: Spoilers!! Complaints, Part 2 talk allowed
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:14 pm to LemmyLives
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:14 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
I think most of us came to bitch about 60 minutes of useless TV
The show was always going to have to expand on the backstory of characters at some point. Otherwise it would be a hour of sneaking around and looking for ladders every week. I wasn’t a huge fan of the backstory of the relationship but the way it tied together was pretty good.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:22 pm to 0
quote:
I wasn’t a huge fan of the backstory of the relationship
If you're going to do an episode on two people, shouldn't they live past that single episode? I mean, it's not five seasons into Walking Dead where you delve into someone's past that you've seen for multiple episodes (if not for two or three seasons.)
TWD and FTWD both got kinda soft in the last three seasons, but the characters already had us invested, so we paid attention when there were weird one-off jags that didn't seem to fit with the overall story arc. That's not where we are with TLOU. I may come back to it after the season closes if they develop a coherent story that is interesting, but to see the actors do this stuff is painful.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 1:16 am to 0
quote:
The show was always going to have to expand on the backstory of characters at some point
Problem is, they did a 180-degree rewrite from the game to do it. Absolutely none of this happens (that we're ever aware of) and the ending is a literal polar opposite of what actually takes place in the game.
Could have done an episode like this with Ish, a character that is basically storyboarded already in the game and has a better story than what we just watched. I won't spoil details of Ish's story in the slim chance the show actually delves into it, but it does everything this episode purportedly does and it's an incredibly more devastating ending vs 2 old twinks ODing in bed together after an evening of dressing up and fine dining.
We all know why this got retconned.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 8:44 am to 0
quote:
(Multiple paraquote) In the game, he was gay.
Not true. It's hinted at, sure. That's it.
quote:
The show was always going to have to expand on the backstory of characters at some point.
Fine. Dive into Ellie and give us some reasons why she is so caustic (perhaps how her parents/siblings(?) were lost). Or go into Joel's life just after the death of his daughter and how he goes medieval on the infected - and perhaps even a few of the not-so-infected. Heck they could even dedicate some interesting dystopian time on the government's response and motivations.
Any of those kind of backstory details progress the story and move it along, even though it's events that occurred in the past. Bill was a small, though interesting, part of the journey. Frank was already dead. Their relationship, whatever that might have been, had nothing to do with the story. What a waste of nice opportunity to fill in some intriguing world building.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 5:25 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News