Started By
Message

re: Bruce Pearl's first three years at Auburn

Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:54 am to
Posted by des4271
Member since Oct 2014
4032 posts
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:54 am to
Well, then you should give MM some damn credit if you think his roster is more talented because he was able to bring in the amount of talent he does have in such a short period of time. He had absolutely no players on the roster and recruited in what he has ( which isn’t much talent.). His roster is undersized, can’t shoot outside nor finish at the rim. That’s a recipe to get your arse beat on a regular basis in the SEC, the competition level is a lot higher every night.

If he doesn’t have the team playing at a lot higher level next year, I understand the criticism then. The supposed rankings of the players he has doesn’t translate on the court, you don’t have to watch long to see he doesn’t have a talented group of shooters or scorers. The only guys who have shown they can create their own opportunities and score consistently are KJ, Miller and Hannibal, the others are very inconsistent and are bonafide bench players. There isn’t any LSU players, other than KJ or maybe Miller, that would be able to start for other SEC teams over their starters.
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
8537 posts
Posted on 1/19/23 at 11:06 am to
I do give MM credit for getting good players here on short notice. But it looks like the development side of it is lacking.

Let’s see how he recruits with an entire season. Early returns don’t look good, but there’s time.

The selling point on MM was that he could coach. He was a good X and O’s guy and the question mark was recruiting. He seemed to pass the recruiting test early, but is failing the X and O’s test, miserably.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram