- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let’s Discuss Filing as S Corp vs SP
Posted on 12/9/22 at 3:10 pm to GeauxldMember
Posted on 12/9/22 at 3:10 pm to GeauxldMember
I think the big thing you're currently missing is the QBI deduction (depending on your income if you are phased out, etc). If not above thresholds, inside an S Corp only the 40K would be eligible for the 20% QBI Deduction, whereas as on a Schedule C, the full 120K would.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 8:43 pm to TheTaxManCometh
quote:
I think the big thing you're currently missing is the QBI deduction (depending on your income if you are phased out, etc). If not above thresholds, inside an S Corp only the 40K would be eligible for the 20% QBI Deduction, whereas as on a Schedule C, the full 120K would.
Was going to mention the same. In the past what may have been slam dunk file as a s-corp, With the QBI deduction on sole prop, it can make s-corp less attractive as the tax savings may not be nearly as much as you think especially if theres any concern for an audit risk with the reasonable salary stipulation.
Best thing is to have your cpa crunch the numbers and go from there.
Posted on 12/10/22 at 1:55 pm to TheTaxManCometh
quote:
I think the big thing you're currently missing is the QBI deduction (depending on your income if you are phased out, etc).
This.
Plus there is a tax court case that says if the income your S corporation earns is for services rendered, then the "distribution" portion is subject to SE taxes. Don't remember the name of the case, but involved a law firm where lawyers tried to take minimal W-2 salaries and the rest in owner distributions. Tax court said the distributions were subject to SE tax.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)