Started By
Message

re: Ketanji Brown Jackson “It’s a Wonderful Life” is Fodder For White Supremacists in Oral Arg

Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:16 am to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99808 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:16 am to
quote:

Maybe so, or maybe not, but either answer gives us a clearer definition of the principles in question in this case


No, it doesn't.

Freedom of speech includes the right to NOT speak, and to selectively speak, and not to be compelled to speak in a fashion you object to or disagree with.

The Court fricked up when it only took up the free speech part of this and not the freedom of religion part of this this. The latter is cleaner, and is imminently easier to support.

You can't compel Jewish or Muslim butchers to serve products that do not conform to their religious doctrines.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21949 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:11 am to
quote:

No, it doesn't.


I mean, it does. Definitionally speaking, how the court rules on this matter gives clarity to the legal interpretation of the principles being discussed in this case.

quote:

Freedom of speech includes the right to NOT speak, and to selectively speak, and not to be compelled to speak in a fashion you object to or disagree with.



Cool. And I happen to agree. Still, this has nothing to do with the post you quoted. The poster wasn't making an argument either way, just clarifying Jackson's statement since the majority here were unable to understand.

quote:

The Court fricked up when it only took up the free speech part of this and not the freedom of religion part of this this. The latter is cleaner, and is imminently easier to support.


Source?
This post was edited on 12/6/22 at 8:14 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram