- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge calls election lawsuit ‘baseless,’ orders Kari Lake, Mark Finchem to pay court fees
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:37 am to Green Chili Tiger
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:37 am to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Seems like presenting some proof would have really helped their case here.
hence the word baseless.
it was all unsupported speculation.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:41 am to CelticDog
Yep.
quote:
But Tuchi said the big problem with the arguments of why machine counts are unreliable is they are based on a lot of "what if" speculations.
"A long chain of hypothetical contingencies must take place for any harm to occur," he wrote. That includes:
-The specific voting equipment used in Arizona must have security failures that allow a malicious actor to manipulate vote totals;
-Such an actor must actually manipulate an election;
-Arizona's specific procedural safeguards must fail to detect the manipulation; and
-The manipulation must change the outcome of the election.
"Plaintiffs fail to plausibly show that Arizona's voting equipment even has such security failures," the judge said. "And even if the allegations in plaintiff's complaint were plausible, their alleged injury is not certainly impending."
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News