Robert Meachem

Cause he's not as good as the WR's who are playing

no charles rogers is a bust you can give up on him if you want but he is gonna be ok

quote:

---

ecause I was right (as usual) and he's a huge BUST

---

yeah, you are always right, Brooks>Brees right?

Because time and time again they break the huddle and he has no idea where to line up. Until his dumb arse learns the playbook he is a liability. He is in coach's doghouse b/c of the Minn game where we cost us points

Seriously, do people just forget that it usually takes many WRs close 3 years to "get it"

quote:

---

One was a #2 pick, the other was #27. I give the #27 a pass more than a #2. Plus, the #27 was out his rookie year with an injury.

---

Injury??? Charles Rogers played in 14 games in three years because of injury.
As far as draft position, from the same draft Steve Breaston was a fifth rounder, Chansi Stuckey was a seventh rounder and Anthony Gonzalez was picked 5 spots later, Sidney Rice was 17 spots later, Dwayne Jarrett 18 spots later and Steve Smith 24 spots later and they have all out performed him. (And we are in a more pass friendly offense)


Not ready to call him an out and out bust, but I don't think you can really defend him either.

Can we trade him for Eddie Royal?

quote:

---

I don't think you can really defend him either

---

I can defend him. However, you bring up a very good point about Rodgers missing a lot of time his first three years. However,I wouldn't be throwing out Jarrett or Syd Rice. I wouldn't take either of them over Meachem...yet. And Gonzalez was picked to play slot. He wouldn't make it on the outside. Meachem is not a slot receiver. Sheet, even Stokely had great years with Indy in the slot. Indy puts their TE in the slot.

ETA: I think you could play slot WR for Indy.

quote:

---

give me a break i was just comparing statistics for brees' rough 4-game start in 2007. nobody thinks brooks > brees

---