- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thermal recommendations
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:07 am to SeaPickle
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:07 am to SeaPickle
Also consider these:
1- your field of view. If you are looking down tight lanes 100-200yds at feeders then a 3.5x is good. If you are scanning larger fields for coyote/pigs and need to engage multiple targets then a lower basemag is better for your FOV
2- When you double your zoom you half your resolution. Either get a higher basemag to keep original imagery or a higher quality scope thay holds resolution better. Going cheap really hurts you here
384res at 3.5x is now 192res at 7x (2x basemag)
1- your field of view. If you are looking down tight lanes 100-200yds at feeders then a 3.5x is good. If you are scanning larger fields for coyote/pigs and need to engage multiple targets then a lower basemag is better for your FOV
2- When you double your zoom you half your resolution. Either get a higher basemag to keep original imagery or a higher quality scope thay holds resolution better. Going cheap really hurts you here
384res at 3.5x is now 192res at 7x (2x basemag)
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 5:16 am
1
Posted on 11/30/22 at 9:49 am to SeaPickle
Hey pickle… so you are saying the thermion 2 XQ50 would be good for 100-200yds? My dad is looking for something similar around $4k.
Btw, videos are badass
Btw, videos are badass
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News