- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/19/22 at 3:38 pm to NIH
quote:
You can deflect all you want but this is just part of the march towards insanity.
I'm not deflecting anything. If you want to make a slippery slope argument, be my guest. Neither of us can prove the future. But if we are talking about this one change, it just doesn't matter. Prior to this change, no applicant was barred from attending law school because their LSAT score wasn't high enough. Any law school could take whatever applicant they wanted, regardless of relative LSAT scores. Going forward, law schools are allowed to mandate LSAT scores if they so choose. And the ABA will still come down on law schools that don't have high Bar passage rates.
In short, everyone can decry this "culture shift", and that's fine. But the people on this thread pretending as though this will have any kind of effect on the number of attorneys in the market, or on the quality of attorneys in the market, are simply ignorant, and I mean that in the purest, least insulting sense possible.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News