- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: To those saying Brooks didn’t have possession
Posted on 11/6/22 at 2:09 pm to Ponchy Tiger
Posted on 11/6/22 at 2:09 pm to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
This situation needs to be addressed even though it doesn't happen very often. A player who is out of bounds as Latu was is not eligible to do anything on the field until he reestablishes himself in bounds. There fore it should be treated like he isn't even there.
Removing that possible scenario from the rules is easier said than done.
For example: if it’s “like he isn’t even there” then a WR or DB could potentially run out of bounds and tip and uncatchable pass back inbounds. That’s why they basically extend the “ground” out of bounds to also apply to any player who is out of bounds.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News