- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying more to understand this fumble non recovery
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:25 am to burke985
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:25 am to burke985
quote:passing rules are newer than the player or non player out of bounds touching a live ball. ANY part of a player out of bounds makes the player out of bounds. It is one of the oldest rules in the game.
The receiving rule
quote:
any receiver who has by any means gone out of bounds may not catch, or be the first to touch, any pass. Re-establishing himself in bounds makes the pass complete, but his touching of the pass remains illegal.
So why can a receiver who caught a ball in bounds fumbled went out of bounds not have to re establish himself inbounds before being able to obtain possession or even touch ball. This is literally the dumbest rule I think I’ve ever seen with this fumble
can a player that willingly goes out of bounds come back in and participate in the play?
I am amazed at how many people simply do not know the rules.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)