- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:28 am to TrueTiger
quote:
I suppose paying for only 4 months of Youtube TV would work.
This is the best option. It's what we do. No lock-in, no BS, no paying for 1000 channels of trash.
The sad reality is that both of these companies are such behemoths, and even so their product is awful. Particularly ESPN. Hard for me to advocate giving money to the network with the 3rd rate announcers, 480p broadcast, middle finger to the fans constantly, and general ineptitude.
ESPN is one of the worst broadcasts pound for pound on television right now. I'd rather watch an FS1 game. Amazon's TNF broadcast might be the best football product point blank I've ever seen, and I'd be embarrassed if I was an ESPN exec.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 9:37 am to TrueTiger
quote:
only watch college football on ESPN. The rest of the year I could care less. I suppose paying for only 4 months of Youtube TV would work
Never thought about that. YoutubeTV for 4 months of the only time I actually use ESPN.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 10:05 am to TrueTiger
quote:
only watch college football on ESPN. The rest of the year I could care less.
I suppose paying for only 4 months of Youtube TV would work.
This is year 3 of the YouTube tv for 4 months plan for us. I like it and don't I'll ever go back to cable/dish.
This post was edited on 10/1/22 at 10:05 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)