- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DA’s should be held accountable
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:30 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:30 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
There will be no exercise of discretion whatsoever. The cost of running such a system would be incalculable.
Cost? What about the incalculable cost to the secondary victims of recidivism from underprosecition? Does society see a way that those preventable injustices get repaid?
I do see it from your perspective though. Look at Healthcare. We all pay for defensive medicine due to physicians being worried about getting sued.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:32 pm to Crimson
you sound like a democrat. You seem to want a world with no risk, no matter the cost of reaching that point.
POST EDIT
I am glad that you now see the potential problems (unintended consequences) of the system proposed by the OP.
POST EDIT
I am glad that you now see the potential problems (unintended consequences) of the system proposed by the OP.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 6:35 pm
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:55 pm to Crimson
quote:
reductio ad absurdum
quote:Call it a one-time expenditure of $25 billion to build the necessary additional courtrooms across the country and another $15 billion per year to staff and run them.
Cost
Then add the extra district attorneys. Let’s be conservative and say one assistant district attorney per court, +2 support personnel. The cost there is another 8 billion per year
VERY rough estimate (and probably low by as much as 50 to 100%), but does that seem like a worthwhile expenditure to avoid a few hundred major felonies by recidivists?
And that does not take into account the crimes that will be committed by the criminals who get tried but not convicted because DAs are afraid to plea bargain. those folks are back on the street committing crimes immediately, rather than 3 to 5 years down the line as would be the case if the DA we’re not afraid to enter into a plea bargain. Personally, I think there would be about a net balance of those cases against the recidivists. Meaning of the net reduction in crime will essentially be zero, at quadruple the cost.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 7:22 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News