- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Author Sophie Lewis' forthcoming book is titled 'Abolish the Family'
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:38 am to deathvalleyfreak43
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:38 am to deathvalleyfreak43
If you ever want the literal caricature/ideal of useful idiots promoting crypto-Marxism, look no further than this subject.
There are 2 main components to this argument:
1. A desire to have state encroach over children in order to promote brainwashing supporting authoritarianism.
2. Differing outcomes based on family status.
The goal is 1 and they use 2 as their justification.
They have to use the most warped "reasoning" to attack 2, and that's the giveaway as to their actual intentions. If you have 2 population groupings and the distinction is based in a traditional/historic status, a rational actor would say, "how do we promote this status with the non-adopting population?" A dishonest actor sees this status as a path away from collectivism, so they warp this status into a "privilege", which we must fight against to stop the inequity.
This concept is created by intelligentsia and then spread by these dullards. They desire the response as a troll because they only care about themselves (ironically) and negative attention not only spreads their importance and perceived intelligence, but it also reinforces how toxic "normal" people and values are (by their response to the trolling). I'm sure this same useful idiot would be the first to tell you all of her degrees as an argument from authority to shut down any actual discussion about her "thesis".
There are 2 main components to this argument:
1. A desire to have state encroach over children in order to promote brainwashing supporting authoritarianism.
2. Differing outcomes based on family status.
The goal is 1 and they use 2 as their justification.
They have to use the most warped "reasoning" to attack 2, and that's the giveaway as to their actual intentions. If you have 2 population groupings and the distinction is based in a traditional/historic status, a rational actor would say, "how do we promote this status with the non-adopting population?" A dishonest actor sees this status as a path away from collectivism, so they warp this status into a "privilege", which we must fight against to stop the inequity.
This concept is created by intelligentsia and then spread by these dullards. They desire the response as a troll because they only care about themselves (ironically) and negative attention not only spreads their importance and perceived intelligence, but it also reinforces how toxic "normal" people and values are (by their response to the trolling). I'm sure this same useful idiot would be the first to tell you all of her degrees as an argument from authority to shut down any actual discussion about her "thesis".
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:52 am to SlowFlowPro
Is the book dedicated to LBJ?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News