Started By
Message

re: Federal Judge Reveals BIDEN WH Ordered FBI Access to Mar-a-Lago Documents

Posted on 9/6/22 at 9:38 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48801 posts
Posted on 9/6/22 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Did you reference any cases other than Judicial Watch v. NARA (Clinton tapes)? Did I miss that somewhere?


Why would I need to? Are you saying the precedent isn’t applicable? If so, why?

quote:

What case is this from? The other two quotes are from JW v. NARA and I don't think they apply here. Don't see any discussion about plenary power.


Same case. Thoughts?
This post was edited on 9/6/22 at 9:39 pm
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 9/6/22 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

Same case.


That's not language from case. Nothing about declassification in JW v. NARA.

In JW v. NARA, JW was a private litigant seeking to compel NARA to declare the "Clinton tapes" to be a Presidential record, a power that NARA does not have, not to mention items that they did not have possession of and had no power to seize. Completely different facts from the current matter.

quote:

In addition, the FRA grants the Archivist authority to:
notify the head of a Federal agency of any actual, impending, or threatened unlawful removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of records in the custody of the agency that shall come to his attention, and assist the head of the agency in initiating action through the Attorney General for the recovery of records wrongfully removed and for other redress provided by law.
44 U.S.C. § 2905(a)


How about this though?

Did you even read this case? I ask because you quoted from a John Solomon article like it was a quote from the case.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram