Started By
Message

re: Have we talked about the Pfizer Study showing 44% miscarriage rate Flg :Vaccine

Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:30 pm to
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32250 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:30 pm to
Ok so I reviewed what you placed and it is in regards to the 50 women in the original trial. Given the mass roll out of the vaccine there should be a much much larger sample size at this point of women who got the vaccine and then became pregnant.

Where is the follow up?
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15558 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:39 pm to
I’m not sure where the follow up is. That’s all the lady in the video was suggesting - that there should be some follow up. If it mimics the part of our immune system that would naturally attack a placenta if you get a cold or viral infection while pregnant, we should probably worry. That’s all this lady seemed to be saying. It certainly is a hypothesis that someone needs to investigate.

Unfortunately- this point I think Covid science is much like the church of climate change. Apostate scientists need not apply. I’ve tuned out any official anything about either of those topics bc the only people authorized to do research about it, would have their lives wrecked if they came to the “wrong” conclusion. It’s so weird and sad and suffocating.
Posted by BurntOrangeMan
Dallas TX
Member since May 2021
5628 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Where is the follow up?


Glad you asked. 230+ additional cases involving pregnancy had their follow up “paused”.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram